
1.6 Conclusion
memory, attention, and learning [?]. Additionally,
neurofeedback, which involves training individuals to
modulate their brain activity, is being explored as a
tool for enhancing cognitive performance. Technolog-
ical advancements, such as brain-computer interfaces
(BCIs) and virtual reality (VR), are emerging as inno-
vative tools for cognitive enhancement. BCIs enable
direct communication between the brain and external
devices, potentially aiding in the rehabilitation of cog-
nitive functions in individuals with neurological im-
pairments. VR technology is being used to create im-
mersive environments for cognitive training, offering
engaging and effective ways to improve mental skills.
1.6 Conclusion
The intersection of BMIs, neurodegenerative dis-
ease research, and cognitive neuroscience represents
a dynamic and rapidly evolving field. The advance-
ments in these areas deepen our understanding of the
brain and hold immense potential for developing inno-
vative treatments and technologies. As research pro-
gresses, the integration of cutting-edge technologies
and interdisciplinary approaches will likely lead to sig-
nificant breakthroughs, ultimately improving the lives
of individuals affected by neurological conditions and
enhancing human cognitive capabilities.
References
[1] https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/
health/neurodegenerative
[2] Illustration-of-a-brain-machine-interface
[3] Bacher, D., Jarosiewicz, B., Masse, N. Y.,
Simeral, J. D., Newell, K., Oakley, E. M., ...
& Donoghue, J. P. (2015). Neural point-and-
click communication by a person with incom-
plete locked-in syndrome. Neurorehabilitation
and Neural Repair, 29(5), 462-471.
[4] Benabid, A. L., Chabardes, S., Mitrofanis, J., &
Pollak, P. (2009). Deep brain stimulation of the
subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkin-
son’s disease. The Lancet Neurology, 8(1), 67-81.
[5] Collinger, J. L., Wodlinger, B., Downey, J. E.,
Wang, W., Tyler-Kabara, E. C., Weber, D. J.,
... & Schwartz, A. B. (2013). High-performance
neuroprosthetic control by an individual with
tetraplegia. The Lancet, 381(9866), 557-564.
[6] Fregni, F., Boggio, P. S., Nitsche, M. A., Rig-
onatti, S. P., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2005). Cog-
nitive effects of repeated sessions of transcranial
direct current stimulation in patients with depres-
sion. Depression and Anxiety, 22(3), 166-170.
[7] Follett, K., Klein, C., & Park, S. (2010). Deep
brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. New
England Journal of Medicine, 362(27), 2519-
2529.
[8] Gualtieri, C. T., & Morgan, D. W. (2008). The fre-
quency of cognitive impairment in patients with
anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder: An un-
accounted source of variance in clinical trials.
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(7), 1122-1130.
[9] Hardy, J. A., & Higgins, G. A. (1992).
Alzheimer’s disease: the amyloid cascade hy-
pothesis. Science, 256(5054), 184-185.
[10] Heneka, M. T., Golenbock, D. T., & Latz, E.
(2015). Innate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease.
Nature Immunology, 16(3), 229-236.
[11] Kolb, B., & Gibb, R. (2011). Brain plasticity and
behaviour in the developing brain. Journal of the
Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psy-
chiatry, 20(4), 265-276.
[12] Parkinson, J. (1817). An Essay on the Shaking
Palsy. Sherwood, Neely, and Jones.
[13] Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integra-
tive theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual
Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167-202.
[14] Spillantini, M. G., Schmidt, M. L., Lee, V. M.
Y., et al. (1997). α-Synuclein in Lewy bodies.
Nature, 388(6645), 839-840.
22